Migrating from HubSpot to GoHighLevel: The 7-Step Migration Plan That Doesn't Lose Data
Migrating between CRMs is one of the most common ways automation projects break. Here's the 7-step plan I follow when moving service businesses from HubSpot to GoHighLevel without dropping data.
Haroon Mohamed
AI Automation & Lead Generation
Why this migration happens often
HubSpot is excellent for marketing-heavy organizations. GoHighLevel is excellent for service businesses with strong sales workflows, SMS-first communication, and agency-style multi-client operations.
Many businesses start on HubSpot because that was the marketing-vendor recommendation, then realize three years in that they don't actually use marketing automation but pay heavily for it, while struggling to do the SMS and follow-up workflows that GHL handles natively.
Migration is the right call when this happens. Done badly, it loses contact history, breaks integrations, and confuses the team for months. Done well, it's a clean cutover with minimal disruption.
This is the seven-step plan I run for clients moving from HubSpot to GoHighLevel.
Step 1: Audit what you actually use
Before exporting anything, map what's actually in HubSpot:
- Contacts: how many, segmented how, with which custom properties
- Companies/deals: which pipelines, which stages, deal volume
- Workflows: which are actively running, which are dormant
- Templates: email templates, snippets, sequences
- Forms: which forms are live and feeding data
- Integrations: what's connected to HubSpot via API, webhook, or native integration
The output is a written inventory. This is the document you'll reference all the way through the migration.
Most clients are surprised at this stage by how much they've accumulated and how much they're not using. Roughly 40-60% of HubSpot workflows in long-running accounts are dormant or duplicative. The migration is a chance to leave the dead workflows behind, not recreate them.
Step 2: Design the GoHighLevel equivalent
Don't try to mirror HubSpot structurally in GHL. The two products organize data differently and forcing one to look like the other produces a worse experience in both.
Map HubSpot deals → GHL opportunities with appropriate pipeline stages.
Map HubSpot contact properties → GHL custom fields, dropping any properties that aren't actually used.
Map HubSpot workflows → GHL workflows, but redesign rather than translate. GHL's workflow primitives are different. Some HubSpot workflows have no clean GHL equivalent and should be replaced with a different approach.
Map HubSpot forms → GHL forms or external form (Tally/Typeform) feeding GHL depending on your form complexity needs.
The output is a target architecture document — what GHL will look like when complete. Get this stable before moving data.
Step 3: Set up GHL with the new structure
Before importing any data, set up GHL to match the target architecture:
- Create custom fields with appropriate names and types
- Build pipelines and stages
- Create tags
- Set up calendars (don't connect them to actual external calendars yet)
- Build skeleton workflows (don't activate them yet)
This phase produces an empty but correctly-shaped GHL sub-account ready to receive data.
Step 4: Export from HubSpot in the right shape
HubSpot's export options vary by object type. The clean approach:
Contacts: Use HubSpot's contact export, including all custom properties. Output is a CSV per segment if you have many segments (otherwise one big CSV).
Companies and deals: Export separately. Note that HubSpot's deal-to-contact and contact-to-company associations need to be preserved — you'll re-establish these in GHL after import.
Activity history: This is the hardest part. HubSpot's activity history (calls, emails, notes, meetings) doesn't export cleanly. Two options:
- Option A (cheap): Don't migrate history. Start fresh in GHL and keep HubSpot read-only for historical reference.
- Option B (full migration): Use HubSpot's API to pull activities per contact and import them as notes in GHL. This is custom work — usually 1-3 days of engineering for a real migration.
Most service businesses choose Option A for speed. Historical activity is rarely accessed after migration; the risk of losing some data is worth the time savings.
Email templates and sequences: Recreate in GHL rather than migrate. The formats are different and a copy job is faster than an import.
Step 5: Import contacts into GHL with deduplication
The actual import:
- Import contacts via GHL's CSV import, mapping HubSpot properties to GHL custom fields
- Set the import to deduplicate on email
- Tag every imported contact with a "migrated_2026" tag so you can identify them later
- Start with a small test batch (50-100 contacts) to verify field mapping before importing the full list
Common gotchas:
- Phone number formatting often varies between systems and causes dedup failures
- Some HubSpot custom property types don't map cleanly to GHL field types — verify each one
- Date fields may import in unexpected timezones — check a sample after import
After full import, run dedup queries against the GHL data to catch any duplicates that slipped through.
Step 6: Rewire integrations
This is where most migrations break. HubSpot has been wired into a bunch of other systems via webhooks, native integrations, and Zaps. All of these need to be repointed at GHL.
The systematic approach:
- List every integration that touches HubSpot (output of Step 1)
- Repoint each one to GHL, one at a time
- Test each with a real flow end-to-end before moving to the next
Common integrations to handle:
- Form submissions (rebuild form-to-CRM connection in GHL)
- Calendar booking (Calendly → GHL contact creation, or migrate to GHL's native calendars)
- Email infrastructure (HubSpot Marketing → GHL or external email tool)
- Payment processors (Stripe webhook into GHL)
- Cold email tools (Apollo/Smartlead → GHL contact creation)
- Reporting/BI tools (HubSpot data sync → GHL or new data layer)
For each, test that data flows correctly with sample records before considering it done.
Step 7: Cutover and parallel run
Don't do a hard cutover. Instead:
Week 1: Parallel run. Both HubSpot and GHL receive new leads. The team continues using HubSpot for active deals; GHL is being verified.
Week 2: GHL primary. New leads go to GHL only. Active deals continue in HubSpot until they close. Team adopts GHL as primary.
Week 3-4: Migrate active deals. Any deal still open in HubSpot moves to GHL. The active workflow goes through GHL only.
Week 5: HubSpot read-only. Demote HubSpot to a historical reference system. Don't add new data; only access for old activity history.
Week 6+: Maintain HubSpot as needed. Eventually you'll downgrade or cancel. But keep it accessible for at least 90 days post-migration in case you need to look up something old.
This pattern catches problems incrementally instead of all at once. Hard cutovers reliably produce a week of operational chaos because nobody's edge-case workflow gets caught until it's already broken.
What you'll lose in this migration
Honest accounting of what's hard or impossible to migrate cleanly:
Email engagement history. HubSpot's "this contact opened your email 3 times" doesn't migrate. GHL starts with no engagement data on imported contacts.
Marketing automation analytics. If you were tracking funnel performance in HubSpot's reporting, that data history doesn't move.
Some custom property data types. Score properties, formula properties, and certain calculated fields don't have GHL equivalents.
Workflow run history. Which workflows fired for which contacts in the past — gone. You'll have only forward-looking history in GHL.
Some HubSpot integrations don't have GHL equivalents. If you depend on a HubSpot-specific app, you may need to find an alternative or build the integration.
For most service businesses, none of these losses are critical. For a marketing-heavy organization, some of them might be — which is why the migration may not be the right call for those orgs.
Timeline expectations
For a typical service business migration (1,000-10,000 contacts, moderate workflow complexity):
- Step 1-2 (audit + design): 2-5 days
- Step 3 (GHL setup): 3-7 days
- Step 4-5 (export + import): 1-3 days
- Step 6 (integrations): 5-15 days (highly variable)
- Step 7 (cutover): 4-6 weeks
Total: 6-12 weeks elapsed. Active work is usually 60-100 hours. Budget more, not less, for the integration step.
When to abort the migration
Sometimes the right call is to stop and stay on HubSpot. Signs you're heading there:
- The integration step is exposing more dependencies than expected and the rebuild cost exceeds the migration savings
- The team is strongly resistant to GHL after seeing it (this is real and matters)
- Workflows are too HubSpot-specific to map cleanly to GHL primitives
- The cost savings projected don't actually materialize once GHL is fully scoped
Better to stop a migration mid-stream than to push through and end up with a worse system. The sunk cost isn't a reason to continue.
If you want help running a HubSpot → GHL migration without losing data, let's talk.
Need This Built?
Ready to implement this for your business?
Everything in this article reflects real systems I've built and operated. Let's talk about yours.
Haroon Mohamed
Full-stack automation, AI, and lead generation specialist. 2+ years running 13+ concurrent client campaigns using GoHighLevel, multiple AI voice providers, Zapier, APIs, and custom data pipelines. Founder of HMX Zone.
Related articles
GoHighLevel Snapshots vs. SaaS Mode: Which Is the Right Agency Model in 2026?
If you're running an agency on GoHighLevel and thinking about scale, you have two business models available within the platform: **Path 1: Snapshot-based agency.** You hold the agency relationship wi…
GoHighLevel Trigger Links: The Underused Feature for Tracking Lead Engagement
A trigger link in GoHighLevel is a trackable URL that, when clicked by a contact, fires a workflow or applies a tag. From the recipient's perspective it looks like a normal link. Behind the scenes, G…